The connection between the spiral arms and the center mass is an illusion. As the tip of
the long axis of the central mass rotates it pulls the next ring of material towards it.
TEST if the speed of the material in the ring is consistent and the arm nearest the ring
is moving faster then the ring, then there are two separate structures.
At the middle of the short axis of the central mass is where the central mass is actually
pushing outward on the next outer ring of material. This is a clue to the quantitative
solution for negative and positive gravity. The distribution of mass in the visible central
mass is a mathematical paradox with only one kind of gravity.
Since we live in a negative gravitational field for this speculation to be correct the
strength of gravitational attraction will need to weaken more quickly than the square
root law. This, or exhibit an abrupt discontinuity. If the first argument is correct then
positive gravity is being masked by the huge negative gravitational field of the Sun.
The measurements of gravity on Earth seem to be non-repeating and not very
consistent compared to measurements of other phenomena. (This is a physically
difficult measurement.) Perhaps the positions of the other planets need to be taken into
account during these measurements. We could be in one or more of the planets or
asteroids repulsion distance.
For some reason the number 2/(100*c) for the gravitational constant seems to be
interesting (in an obsessive-compulsive way).
And Yes, I am going to ignore the Pioneer Spacecraft Data. I did a calculation that
assumed a periodic oscillating function of negative and positive gravity and it worked
really well for the data. There may be a simple explanation for the Pioneer Anomaly
but it may be masked by human error. The Pioneers are just two spacecraft examples
when there are entire galaxies without human errors. The universe works the way it
works, the problem is just in our heads.
the long axis of the central mass rotates it pulls the next ring of material towards it.
TEST if the speed of the material in the ring is consistent and the arm nearest the ring
is moving faster then the ring, then there are two separate structures.
At the middle of the short axis of the central mass is where the central mass is actually
pushing outward on the next outer ring of material. This is a clue to the quantitative
solution for negative and positive gravity. The distribution of mass in the visible central
mass is a mathematical paradox with only one kind of gravity.
Since we live in a negative gravitational field for this speculation to be correct the
strength of gravitational attraction will need to weaken more quickly than the square
root law. This, or exhibit an abrupt discontinuity. If the first argument is correct then
positive gravity is being masked by the huge negative gravitational field of the Sun.
The measurements of gravity on Earth seem to be non-repeating and not very
consistent compared to measurements of other phenomena. (This is a physically
difficult measurement.) Perhaps the positions of the other planets need to be taken into
account during these measurements. We could be in one or more of the planets or
asteroids repulsion distance.
For some reason the number 2/(100*c) for the gravitational constant seems to be
interesting (in an obsessive-compulsive way).
And Yes, I am going to ignore the Pioneer Spacecraft Data. I did a calculation that
assumed a periodic oscillating function of negative and positive gravity and it worked
really well for the data. There may be a simple explanation for the Pioneer Anomaly
but it may be masked by human error. The Pioneers are just two spacecraft examples
when there are entire galaxies without human errors. The universe works the way it
works, the problem is just in our heads.
| All rights reserved. |
Alien Technology on Earth
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
Copyrighted by Louis P. Quinn 2009
| Application to Spiral Galaxies, Globular Clusters and Dark Matter |
The question isn’t, why are the stars in the arms of a spiral galaxy are moving so fast, it
is why are the stars near the center of the spiral galaxies moving so slowly!
1. In the very center of the galaxy the repulsion forces of gravity are completely
masked by the large masses and the close proximity of masses.
2. There is a gap or thinning of material. This may appear as a dusty region that is
optically dense.
3. There is a large ring mass, a portion of which is at the repulsion distance of the core.
This ring mass is moving more slowly than it should because the strength of positive
gravitational field from the center mass is becoming stronger relative to the negative
gravitational field. The thinning area between the center mass and center ring allows the
positive field to come out of the background more.
4. The velocity curve for the arms is actually closer to correct than the inner mass
velocity would suggest. If the inner ring velocity were faster the curve would look
correct. Though arguably there should be a lot of positive gravity in the space around
the arms and their velocity should be less. Which would dominate, the greater ring
mass or the positive gravity?
is why are the stars near the center of the spiral galaxies moving so slowly!
1. In the very center of the galaxy the repulsion forces of gravity are completely
masked by the large masses and the close proximity of masses.
2. There is a gap or thinning of material. This may appear as a dusty region that is
optically dense.
3. There is a large ring mass, a portion of which is at the repulsion distance of the core.
This ring mass is moving more slowly than it should because the strength of positive
gravitational field from the center mass is becoming stronger relative to the negative
gravitational field. The thinning area between the center mass and center ring allows the
positive field to come out of the background more.
4. The velocity curve for the arms is actually closer to correct than the inner mass
velocity would suggest. If the inner ring velocity were faster the curve would look
correct. Though arguably there should be a lot of positive gravity in the space around
the arms and their velocity should be less. Which would dominate, the greater ring
mass or the positive gravity?
| Rantings on the Current Understanding of Gravity Speculation that Gravity is Conserved The averaged force of gravity throughout the universe is zero! |
An inexact analogy of the affect of gravity on the fabric of space would be a fabric
that is stretched across a container that is completely full of liquid. A large mass
depresses the fabric into the liquid. At some distance from the mass, the pressure from
the liquid pushes the fabric above the lip of the container. The volume which is
depressed into the liquid is the same as the volume which rises above the edge of the
container. The two gravitational forms equal and cancel over the volume of the
universe.
Space that will act to exclude matter I will call positive. Positive gravity is nearly
always weaker than negative (or matter attracting) gravity since it is only detectable far
from large masses and only over a long period of time. The structure of galaxies tells
the story and I hope I am reading it correctly.
that is stretched across a container that is completely full of liquid. A large mass
depresses the fabric into the liquid. At some distance from the mass, the pressure from
the liquid pushes the fabric above the lip of the container. The volume which is
depressed into the liquid is the same as the volume which rises above the edge of the
container. The two gravitational forms equal and cancel over the volume of the
universe.
Space that will act to exclude matter I will call positive. Positive gravity is nearly
always weaker than negative (or matter attracting) gravity since it is only detectable far
from large masses and only over a long period of time. The structure of galaxies tells
the story and I hope I am reading it correctly.
| The Windup Problem/Challenge/Gauntlet |
View 1. Positive gravity may have the same origin point as negative gravity. It may
decrease at a rate that is less than the square root law. Positive gravity might only
decrease at +g = g/(r*pi). It could be a degenerate form of negative gravity. (I have
included the following though it isn't well defined i.e. doesn't make sense) It may have
fewer dimensions than negative gravity.
decrease at a rate that is less than the square root law. Positive gravity might only
decrease at +g = g/(r*pi). It could be a degenerate form of negative gravity. (I have
included the following though it isn't well defined i.e. doesn't make sense) It may have
fewer dimensions than negative gravity.
| Looking for a Path Through the Contradictions |
| Globular Clusters and Positive Gravity |
Globular clusters don't exhibit as many velocity discrepancies as spiral galaxies. They
also do not exist in one plane or have the gaps that spiral galaxies have. Positive
gravity comes to the foreground when the mass is in one plane. For positive gravity to
become apparent (in a beehive cluster) it would need to segregate the melee of orbits
into semi discrete shells. The velocities of the shells would be similar to the spiral
galaxy distribution.
also do not exist in one plane or have the gaps that spiral galaxies have. Positive
gravity comes to the foreground when the mass is in one plane. For positive gravity to
become apparent (in a beehive cluster) it would need to segregate the melee of orbits
into semi discrete shells. The velocities of the shells would be similar to the spiral
galaxy distribution.
| Dark Matter |
| There is a very simple reason why experiments have not found dark matter. Ain't no such thing! Unless you want to follow Nibbler (from Futurama) around for a while. |
What most people get to see is the clean self-consistent results of creative thought.
This reveals the messy and contradictory abyss that many well trained and
disciplined minds cannot cross. I should also include sensible minds too, since
bouncing off the bottom of the abyss is pretty painful (psychologically). (see Wile E.
Coyote for the cartoon version)
This reveals the messy and contradictory abyss that many well trained and
disciplined minds cannot cross. I should also include sensible minds too, since
bouncing off the bottom of the abyss is pretty painful (psychologically). (see Wile E.
Coyote for the cartoon version)
| Positive Gravity and the Increasing Speed of the Universe's Expansion |
As the space between galaxies increases, the masking of positive gravity decreases.
galaxies increases. As the repulsion between galaxies increases, the velocity of the
universe's expansion increases.
galaxies increases. As the repulsion between galaxies increases, the velocity of the
universe's expansion increases.
View 2. Positive gravity is the reaction or rebound of empty space to negative gravity.